Arguably the biggest potential merger of brick-and-mortar gambling operations in the United States is moving forward, as Tilman Fertitta and his representatives have reached a tentative agreement for Fertitta Entertainment to acquire the entirety of Caesars Entertainment stock with the aim of taking Caesars private. The transaction is pending further approvals, including Caesars shareholder acceptance of the offer and regulatory scrutiny, but there are reasons to believe that neither step will present an obstacle.
Given Fertitta Entertainment’s focus on land-based gaming, bringing Caesars under Fertitta management raises questions about the future of Caesars’ digital gaming platforms. There are multiple paths forward in terms of a separation of Caesars’ digital and land-based operations.

(Photo by: Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Fertitta Entertainment has multiple brands in its portfolio, including the Golden Nugget-branded physical casinos across the U.S. Those holdings could expand to include Caesars in the coming months.
According to a press release from Caesars, Fertitta is offering $31 per share for all of Caesars, representing a cost of more than $5.7 billion. Caesars Entertainment operates over 50 land-based gambling facilities in the U.S. across multiple brands like Caesars Palace, Eldorado, Harrah’s, Horseshoe, and Tropicana.
Caesars’ digital division includes a Caesars-branded horse racebook, online casino, and sportsbook. That division boasts Harrah’s, Horseshoe, and Tropicana iGaming products, too.
The digital products feature WSOP.com, one of the more prominent online poker products in the U.S., as well. Whether Fertitta Entertainment would continue to devote resources to the digital products is a matter of speculation.
Fertitta Entertainment was in the online gambling business but exited while the regulated industry in the U.S. was still in its infancy. Fertitta sold Golden Nugget’s online gambling products to DraftKings in 2021.
While Golden Nugget Online Gambling (GNOG) has had a minuscule presence in the realm of online sports wagering, its market share in terms of online casino revenue in Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia is more significant. In April in New Jersey, for example, Golden Nugget Online Casino reported over $11 million in winnings from players.
That online casino presence is what made GNOG attractive to DraftKings. The entire suite of Caesars brands could be attractive to a buyer for the same reason.
Using April numbers from New Jersey as an example again, Caesars Palace Online Casino, Tropicana Casino, and WSOP.com combined for over $21.1 million in taxable revenue. Caesars Sportsbook online in New Jersey during the same month represented almost $2.6 million in taxable win.
Adding another nearly $24 million in taxable win on a monthly basis would help a buyer strengthen its share of the online gambling markets in the states where Caesars’ casino products operate, which are the most robust in that regard of the eight where iGaming is legal. Caesars’ online sports betting operations add to that value in the U.S. jurisdictions where that form of online gambling is legal.
Because Caesars Digital’s own market share is relatively small in these jurisdictions, the acquisition price of the various brands may be affordable. The most valuable of them could be the WSOP, which Caesars may elect to keep or may spin off into an independent enterprise.
The Caesars, Harrah’s, Horseshoe, Tropicana, and WSOP branding could be attractive to potential buyers, similar to the interest shown in DraftKings and Golden Nugget. Regulators may also have a say in how the Fertitta takeover plays out.
Because Fertitta Entertainment’s potential takeover of Caesars involves gambling businesses, gaming and trade regulators will be part of the approval process for the transaction. Obtaining that approval may require Caesars/Fertitta to divest from certain assets.
Admittedly, that might be less of a concern when it comes to online gambling because of Golden Nugget’s relative lack of any online gambling operations. However, voluntarily selling off the digital business might convince regulators to be more conservative when deciding whether Fertitta could continue to operate brick-and-mortar casinos.
Such divestitures are commonplace in gambling mergers. As an example, the former Eldorado Resorts sold off three of its casinos in 2020 to comply with regulator demands when it acquired Caesars. Those demands focused on maintaining competition in affected areas and keeping the new Caesars company from controlling too much of the market.
Those same concerns could complicate the process of parceling out Caesars Digital. That would especially be true in the event that a single buyer wants to acquire the lot.
If Fertitta is keen on replicating his past actions with GNOG regarding Caesars Digital, securing regulatory approval could be a prominent concern. The significance of that concern could fluctuate based on the status of a buyer, too.
If one of the four biggest brands in the U.S. seeks to acquire all of Caesars Digital, that’s a more precarious position. Those brands are BetMGM, DraftKings, Fanatics, and FanDuel.
An offer from a company like Bally’s, bet365, or Rush Street Interactive might be less controversial. At the same time, parceling Caesars Digital out instead of selling it as a single unit could also represent less of a risk for regulatory obstacles.
Spinning Caesars Digital off would sidestep all the potential regulatory issues that come with selling those operations as a whole or several units. It could represent a capital infusion that would facilitate Fertitta’s takeover of Caesars’ land-based operations, too.
Selling off part or all of Caesars Digital depends on finding a buyer or buyers willing to meet Fertitta’s terms. Creating an IPO or using another mechanism to take Caesars Digital public could achieve some of the same goals, but under a different regulatory structure.
In the past, online gambling companies going public has generated a substantial amount of capital. DraftKings’ blank check company raised $350 million with its initial public offering, for example.
Given the brand recognition, Caesars Digital could continue that trend. It’s possible that the response to a public offering could be better than the deal any single or small group of buyers would give Fertitta for Caesars Digital, too.
That could allow Fertitta to continue focusing on physical gaming and hospitality while maximizing the value of Caesars Digital. All of these options are contingent on shareholder and regulatory approval, but when that time comes, Fertitta will have several options for the future of Caesars Digital.
Make sure to visit the Ballislife Play page for more of the latest news and updates.